United States v. U.S. District Court - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

United States v. U.S. District Court
Results: 188

#	Item
41	Nanopierce Tech. v. Depository Trust, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 38 (Sept. 20, [removed]CORPORATE LAW – SECURITIES FRAUD Summary Appeal from a district court order dismissing a securities fraud action. Disposition/Outcome Add to Reading List Source URL: law.unlv.edu Language: English - Date: 2010-10-05 16:24:44 Securities United States securities law Financial regulation Short selling Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation Securities Exchange Act Short U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities regulation in the United States Financial economics Financial system Finance
42	On October 18, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of MedImmune’s suit seeking a declaration that U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415, which relates to human antibody production, is invalid and un Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-12-07 07:28:28 Patent law Declaratory judgment Patent prosecution United States patent law Inequitable conduct Cabilly patents Law Civil law MedImmune Inc. v. Genentech Inc.
43	On August 11, 2005, the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that American Seating infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,492,389, which related to stowable vehicle seats, under the doctrine Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-08-25 11:14:32 Doctrine of equivalents Property law All elements test Claim United States patent law Patent Person having ordinary skill in the art Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Patent infringement Patent law Law Civil law
44	On August 19, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that Techniche did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,371,977, which related to a protective mu Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-08-25 11:13:30 Common law Equity Doctrine of equivalents Prosecution history estoppel Estoppel United States patent law Claim Patent Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Law Civil law Patent law
45	E. R. ZUMWALT, JR. ADMIRAL. U. S. NAVY (RET.) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION From the Office of Admiral E. R. Zumwalt, Jr. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.virtual.vietnam.ttu.edu Language: English Abstention doctrine Amicus curiae United States federal courts State court Elmo Zumwalt Supreme Court of the United States United States district court Res judicata Younger v. Harris Law Civil procedure Agent Orange
46	On October 4, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that ERM did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,710,835, which related to wavelet transforms, and that the patent was invalid under 35 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:30:21 Property law Claim Person having ordinary skill in the art Title 35 of the United States Code Prior art Patent LizardTech Inc. v. Earth Resource Mapping Inc. Sufficiency of disclosure Patent law Law Civil law
47	[Cite as Harris v. Mayfield Hts., 2013-Ohio[removed]Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA Add to Reading List Source URL: www.sconet.state.oh.us Language: English - Date: 2013-06-13 13:29:29 Property law Justice Equitable sharing Fine Oregon Ballot Measure 53 United States v. $124 700 in U.S. Currency Asset forfeiture Law Criminal law
48	On May 23, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s entry of judgment upon the jury verdict that Imonex infringed U.S. Patent No. 4,911,280, which related to coin selectors, and the award of $1,396,872 i Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-06-07 12:04:51 Patent infringement Ecolab v. FMC United States patent law Patent law Law
49	On June 9, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment as a matter of law that U.S. Patent No. 5,045,172, which related to a capillary electrophoresis device, was invalid as obvious. The Federal Ci Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:43 Property law Inventive step and non-obviousness Person having ordinary skill in the art Title 35 of the United States Code Prior art Claim United States patent law Novelty and non-obviousness in Canadian patent law KSR v. Teleflex Patent law Law Civil law
50	E. R. ZUMWALT, JR. ADMIRAL, U. S. NAVY (RET.) MEMORANDUM TO: Add to Reading List Source URL: www.virtual.vietnam.ttu.edu Language: English Roman law State court Abstention doctrine United States district court Agent Orange United States federal courts Removal jurisdiction Southland Corp. v. Keating Law Civil procedure Amicus curiae